The arrival of the Sky Player

The High Definition Home by Selva

Marie Kemplay looks at the impending launch of the Sky Player

Following in the footsteps of the BBC, ITV and Channel 4, Sky have announced they are to launch their own online viewing platform. The imaginatively named Sky Player will show programmes from some of the broadcaster’s most popular channels such as Sky One and National Geographic. Although they are yet to confirm many of the channels they have already said that Sky Sports will be available. So you’ll be able to watch that winning putt/try/goal over and over again. They are currently in negotiations with Hollywood executives over showing films from Sky Movies as well.

The best news is that Sky player will be available to everybody, regardless of whether you subscribe to Sky television or not. This poses the obvious question of why bother having a television anymore? Several of my friends now solely really on their computers to watch their favourite programmes. However, for the time being at least, television sets will still provide superior viewing. In the words of Mike Darcy, Chief Operating Officer of Sky: “While the laptop won’t replace the TV experience for most people, we’re creating more choices to allow customers to choose the option that suits their lifestyle”.

Perfect, laptop for example when you’re up late and don’t want to wake everybody up and television for when you fancy a night in with a good film. I love this new flexible way of viewing television; Teletext will soon be as obsolete as the milkman and the floppy disk. I can’t imagine that High Definition laptops are too far away in the future either. They would certainly be the perfect excuse for a long train journey; my great aunt in Abergavenny would probably get more visits!

Sky player will be launched “in the next few months” according to Darcy. In the meantime you might actually have to suffer the inconvenience of watching programmes at their listed times on that familiar big square box in your living room.

News from the Sky

 alt=

Latest digital news developments

The digital television industry is alight with rumours that Sky is on the verge of making an offer of around £450m for Tiscali UK.

Tiscali, who are based in Italy, are one of Europe’s largest telecommunication companies. They offer services that range from Internet provision to digital television. There already exists an agreement between Sky and Tiscali that allows Tiscali subscribers to enjoy premium Sky channels such as Sky Sports and Sky Movies.

A potential merger is considered to be likely between these two companies that already have a history of working together. Another rival for the Tiscali business, Carphone Warehouse, is reported to have recently withdrawn its interest.

Sky meanwhile have reported that, for the first time, they have broken the 9m customer barrier for the first time. As of the end of October, Sky’s satellite, TV, broadband and telecoms company had a total of 9,067,000 customers – making it one of Britain’s largest telecommunication companies.

The Presidential Election 2008

 alt=

Tuesday, 4th November, 2008

  • 136.6 million Americans voted
  • The result of the popular vote was 51.9 percent for Obama and 46.8 percent for McCain
  • Shortly after 11:00pm EST John McCain conceded defeat. “The American people have spoken, and they have spoken clearly,” he said.
  • At 11:12 EST, President Bush made a telephone call to congratulate Obama. “You are about to go on one of the great journeys of life. Congratulations and go enjoy yourself,” the President said.
  • About half an hour later a victorious Obama emerged onto a wide platform in front of his fans to declare victory. “It’s been a long time coming, but tonight, because of what we did on this date in this election at this defining moment, change has come to America,

Judgement Day has arrived

 alt=

Americans are currently streaming to the polling booths, and within twenty four hours we will know who George Bush’s successor will be. Marie Kemplay thinks for a final time. Who will be the next president of the United States?

After months of hard campaigning, debates and Tina Fey’s wonderful Sarah Palin impersonations the U.S presidential election is finally upon us.

There has been talk over the last week about just how little it will matter in the long term which candidate is elected president. It has been argued that such is the state of the US economy and finances that the agenda is largely stitched up by financial constraints. But psychologically it matters hugely, after the final depressing years of the Bush Presidency with its historic low approval ratings and the recent economic turmoil; Americans desperately crave something to be optimistic about. Both candidates want to completely disassociate themselves from the past eight years and offer Americans a new exciting chapter in their country’s history.

All the polls are predicting a clear win for Barack Obama but Americans are fickle creatures and polls are not always a reliable indicator of who will win. Many are worried Obama could be a victim of the so-called ‘Bradley effect’ named after Tom Bradley, a black man who was Mayor of Los Angeles who ran for Governor of California in 1972 with a 10-point lead in the polls but lost after white voters who promised their votes did not actually vote for him. Also to be considered is the effect Sarah Palin has had on John McCain’s campaign, has she been a boost or a liability? And whether when push comes to shove Americans will opt for an experienced politician like McCain or for the excitement and vibrancy of Barack Obama.

It’s exciting stuff and we’ve got a great vantage point at this side of the Atlantic, all the drama without and responsibility or input. So if you’re anything like me you’ll be settling down in front of the TV tonight with a beer and a big bowl of pistachio nuts, it’s going to be a long night.

Kerry Katona: a life dictated by celebrity?

 alt=

In a secular, capitalist society, our aspirations often lead us towards celebrity - but is this dream lifestyle laced with a curse? Marie Kemplay looks at the case of Kerry Katona

It’s been a bad week for Kerry Katona, - “what week isn’t?” I may hear you ask - after she slurred her way through a cringe inducing interview on This Morning last week. Her publicist Max Clifford, who Kerry once described as a ‘surrogate father’, has announced he will no longer represent her. In an interview with Heat magazine he said he was increasingly worried about the foundering celeb after being told by Kerry’s friends that she is drinking more and more, earlier and earlier. It completes what has been a spectacular fall from grace for the bubbly 28 year old who was once ‘Queen of the Jungle’ and a mum of the year candidate.

Kerry who was in and out of care from an early age did not have an easy start in life. But things started looking up for her after a brief and modestly successful career in girl band Atomic Kitten who had chart success with songs such as Whole Again which made it to number one. Lyrics like “So come on baby do it to me good now, Do it to me slowly (oh yeah), Do it to me Right Now” might explain why Atomic Kitten aren’t remembered for their profound lyrical talent.

In 2001 she had every tweenager’s dream marriage to blonde, airbrushed popstar, Bryan McFadden of Westlife ‘fame’. But the marriage was short-lived and after having two daughters, Molly and Lilly-Sue the pair split in 2004, causing Kerry to spiral into a drug fuelled depression followed by a spell in rehab. Last year she married taxi driver Mark Croft and the pair have two children, Heidi and Mark. Kerry provoked outrage in the media for continuing to smoke and drink during the pregnancies, claiming she didn’t think a few puffs would do much harm.

Add to this an armed robbery at her home in July 2007 triggering symptoms of bi-polar disorder, being declared bankrupt in August 2008 for failing to pay a tax bill, constant rumours that she is on drugs and her ongoing custody battle with her McFadden and it’s little wonder she is struggling to hold it together.

It’s all a far cry from her former Atomic Kitten band mates who are both preparing to release solo albums. Natasha Hamilton has recently finished touring with Lionel Ritchie, appeared in the BBC series “Just the Two of Us” and won the ‘Rear of the Year’ award in 2003. Liz McClarnon won Celebrity Masterchef in July and made her debut as a National Lottery presenter last Wednesday.

It’s hard not to feel sorry for Kerry; the media thrives on her and other celebrities like her. For example Amy Winehouse has constantly been in the papers over the past year for her drink and drug fuelled exploits in Camden. Allegedly shoplifting, attacking people in the street and wandering around in her bra in the early hours of the morning, all perfect tabloid fodder; sometimes all that’s necessary is for her to come out of her house and look a bit ropey. In America Britney Spears hasn’t had it much better. Her whole bitter custody battle with ex-husband Kevin Federline and her mental health problems have been lapped up by the media. Her personal nadir arrived when she was filmed being taken to hospital in an ambulance chasing frenzy.

Despite Kerry complaining that Phillip Schofield and Fern Britton stitched her up, they would never have exposed her to that kind of media firestorm and conducted the interview had they known what a state she was. They claimed that she arrived too late for them to speak to her before going on air. Schofield said in the Daily Mail earlier this week: “In my mind she shouldn’t be paraded on television - she should be taken home and loved up and cared for.” I couldn’t agree more. But it seems MTV do not agree and their documentary Whole Again, broadcast on Sundays, shows Kerry giving birth and having breast reduction surgery.

Friday Night without Jonathan Ross.

 alt=

With half of England scandalised by the actions of two of its favourite comedians, Marie Kemplay asks whether it is all justified

I must admit I do actually quite like Jonathan Ross. His Friday night questioning of people from all corners of celebrity is one of my favourite programmes and as a result of his suspension my Friday evenings will be far less entertaining. Granted tonight I’ll be too busy stumbling around in whatever costume I can find in Tesco later.

But I find myself thinking is Jonathan Ross really the reason why I tune in on a Friday or is for the celebrities themselves. And is Russell Brand really that funny or is it his scriptwriters? I went to watch his chat show being filmed last year and it was one of the most disillusioning experiences. He read the entire thing off an autocue and then threw in a bit of gesticulation and outlandish phraseology for good measure. They both have over-inflated egos that would benefit from being knocked down a couple of pegs.

I’m not baying for blood in the same way a lot of the right wing press appear to be but I do agree the line has to be drawn somewhere. The content of the message left on Andrew Sachs mobile was pretty disgusting, with Ross shouting “he f***** you granddaughter” and Brand retaliating “it’s ok I used a condom”.

The whole thing just reeks of stupidity; this was a BBC Radio 2 programme not a late night TV special, and they were leaving messages on a 78 year old man’s answer phone, someone you would perhaps expect to speak to more respectfully. As for Georgina Baillie, regardless of whether she is a “Satanic Slut” I’m sure she doesn’t want her sex life broadcast to the nation. You really would have expected Brand, Ross and whoever authorised the broadcast to know better.

But that was all it was, stupidity, certainly not enough to warrant Lesley Davies, Controller of Radio 2, a highly competent woman and who by all accounts did nothing wrong in this so called ‘scandal’, losing her job. Brand was right to resign, his radio show would never have been received in the same way and it was right that Ross was suspended, the BBC needed breathing space - but as even Andrew Sachs admitted performers make mistakes.

The BBC is a fantastic institution, highly regarded worldwide and something of which we should be immensely proud, of course it has its problems but that doesn’t mean we should allow it to be trounced out of all recognition by the right wing media. We want a broadcaster that’s willing to take risks, not one held back by the worst aspects conservative (with a small c) society.

Where brands meet religion

Buyology - The psychology behind why we buy

So what does the Roman Catholic Church have in common with Nintendo, the video games manufacturer? Not much you might assume. Both are quite old: in the case of the Roman Catholic Church a couple of millennia, whilst next year Nintendo will, rather surprisingly, celebrate its 120th birthday. But, aside from this, you’d probably be stumped for an answer – and for inspiration you’d have to turn to the latest book from the Danish author Martin Lindstrom.

Lindstrom is generally regarded as one of the world’s top marketing gurus, spending the majority of his time skipping around the globe preaching on the fundamentals of his marketing theory – Buyology. More than a mere pun, the word Buyology, refers to an astute psychological analysis of human behaviour, asking the question: ‘just what psychological factors impel us towards brand allegiance?’

Why is it that we react positively to slogans, jingles and celebrity endorsements? Just think of Levi’s Flat Eric. How was it that a stuffed toy with attitude, riding the highways of California, could have a far more pronounced effect on the human mind than all the graphic warnings on the front of cigarette cartons can? Why are we tied so closely to our favourite brands? What is the psychology behind all of the symbols and logos? Why have Singapore Airways gone to the trouble of creating their own branded smell for their fleet of aircraft?

To explain these puzzling questions, Lindstrom has turned to that most horribly complicated of instruments, the human mind. Lindstrom argues that the reasons that we buy a brand, and why we remain fiercely loyal to it, are burrowed deep within our sub conscious.

This is the crux, where the psychology behind the success of the great religions of the world mirrors the psychology behind a successful brand – from Rolex to Coca Cola. ‘The same area of the human brain,’ Lindstrom argues, ties a person to their religious faith as makes a consumer loyal to a successful brand. Essentially it is the same impulses that keep Roman Catholics pious as keep newer generations hooked to products like the Nintendo Wii.

Understanding these impulses, Lindstrom advocates, is key to building a successful brand or product. From Richard Branson, to fourteenth century popes, he argues, successful branding lies at the root of their success. For aspiring marketers, businessmen on the lookout for new ideas, or psychologists merely interested in the motivations of the mind – this could be a book that is too good to be missed.

Expensive Style: Sarah Palin and the $150,000 shopping spree

 alt=

A pit-bull in designer lipstick and Valentino suits, Marie Kemplay explains why Sarah Palin is perhaps not the ordinary hockey mom she professes to be.

In the absence of any serious politics at the other side of the Atlantic media attention has once again returned to the soap opera of Sarah Palin. Over the past few days the Republican party has been heavily criticised for going on a $150,000 spending spree of designer couture and make-up for Sarah Palin and her family – even her infant son – after she was chosen as the Republican’s vice presidential candidate in August.

The Republican Party claims it was always their intention to donate the clothes to charity but in these times of acute economic hardship for ordinary Americans, it would have perhaps reflected better on them if they had tightened their metaphorical belts rather than buying Sarah Palin several new ones and a host of designer suits.

The entire election campaign reeks of overspending and excess, and both parties are just as guilty. This election has broken all records for fundraising and spending; $961 million was raised by both parties by the end of September and the figure is set to pass the $1bn mark by November 4th,with some estimates putting the total cost at more like $2bn.

Obama has always viewed high spending as the key to victory and since September has bought 330,000 adverts in all the battleground states compared with 100,000 by McCain. And despite his populist pretensions, only a quarter of the $600m his team have raised so far has come from the small donors of $200 or less who he likes to claim are the lifeblood of his campaign. But with Obama 7.4% ahead in the polls at the time of writing it seems his strategy is paying off.

Copyright © 2008 TV Packages Blog.